Reflecting on Tutor Feedback in Relation to Learning Outcomes
(Reference to the outcome of module 2.3 as part of my continuous learning)
Following the feedback received, I have reflected on my work in relation to the four learning outcomes of the unit. This process has helped me to identify both the strengths within my practice and the areas that require further development as I progress into Stage 3. The feedback confirms my engagement with language, identity, and interdisciplinary practice, while also emphasising the need for greater depth, integration, and critical clarity.
In relation to knowledge, the feedback acknowledges that I am engaging with a broad range of ideas, including poetic language, visual communication, and cultural references such as Aesop’s fables. However, it also highlights that my approach has tended towards breadth rather than depth. While I demonstrate awareness of relevant concepts and contexts, I realise that I need to develop a more focused and sustained engagement with selected sources. Moving forward, I will concentrate on fewer references, exploring them in greater analytical depth and establishing clearer links between theoretical ideas and my own creative practice. This will allow me to strengthen my understanding of the subject and demonstrate a more confident awareness of its boundaries.
In terms of understanding, the feedback indicates that I am able to select and interpret a range of research, but that my critical engagement requires further development. In my critical review, the use of bullet points limited my ability to construct a coherent and detailed argument. I now understand that effective critical thinking involves not only identifying ideas but also comparing, analysing, and reflecting on them in a sustained way. As I move forward, I will focus on developing a more continuous and analytical writing style, allowing me to articulate clearer relationships between different sources and to position my own work more effectively within a wider context. This shift will support a deeper and more nuanced understanding of both theory and practice.
With regard to application, the feedback highlights that I am beginning to apply a range of practical, technical, and communication skills, particularly through my use of moving image. My film work, which combines photography, text, and sound, has been recognised as a strong element with significant potential. However, it is also clear that these components currently operate as separate layers rather than as a fully integrated whole. In response, I intend to develop a more cohesive approach in which image, text, and sound interact and inform each other. I will explore ways in which text becomes embedded within the visual composition, and I will use sound not merely as background but as an active narrative element. This will involve experimenting with natural soundscapes, voice, and silence, allowing them to contribute meaningfully to the work’s overall structure. In addition, I will continue to develop my technical skills, particularly in editing and digital tools, in order to support a more refined and intentional application of my ideas.
Across all learning outcomes, the feedback encourages me to extend my exploration of language beyond conventional forms. My earlier work with hybrid language, described as “Greenglish,” demonstrated an initial engagement with linguistic experimentation. I now recognise the potential to develop this further into a more abstract and sensory form of communication: the sound of the sea, the echo of the land, the language that comes from the sky. By exploring asemic writing and non-verbal forms of expression, I aim to create a language that is not limited to words but is instead experienced through sound, rhythm, and visual form to become part of my narrative. This direction aligns closely with my thematic focus on migration and identity, particularly the experience of existing between cultures and languages.
In response to this reflection, I will adapt my project plan to prioritise greater analytical depth, stronger integration of media, and more focused experimentation with non-verbal communication. I will also build on the strengths identified in my moving image work by developing a more structured film of approximately seven to eight minutes, bringing together my photographic material from China, the Isle of Man, the UK, Italy, Greece and Scotland. This work will explore migration as an ongoing process, using dual modes of communication, such as spoken Greek and written English, to reflect the complexity of linguistic and cultural experience.
In conclusion, this feedback has been instrumental in clarising the direction of my practice. It confirms that my current themes and methods are relevant, while also challenging me to refine my approach and deepen my engagement with both theory and practice. As I move into Stage 3, my focus will be on producing more integrated, intentional, and critically informed work that demonstrates a stronger alignment with the learning outcomes and a more developed personal voice.
Alexander's blog 